Explore the effect of Hempaguard compared to conventional antifouling systems. Pull the slider below and see the difference between the test-area coated with Hempaguard and the area coated with a market average solution – in this case on a suezmax oil tanker laid up for 3 months in fouling-aggressive Singaporean water. It is estimated that had the entire ship been coated, not only the test area, the operator would save 2,2 million dollar on the fuel bill.

Pull the slider and discover the effect of Hempaguard compared to market average solutions

WebP image:

Explore the effect of Hempaguard compared to conventional antifouling systems. Pull the slider below and see the difference between the test-area coated with Hempaguard and the area coated with a market average solution – in this case on a suezmax oil tanker laid up for 3 months in fouling-aggressive Singaporean water. It is estimated that had the entire ship been coated, not only the test area, the operator would save 2,2 million dollar on the fuel bill.

Pull the slider and discover the effect of Hempaguard compared to market average solutions

Explore the effect of Hempaguard compared to conventional antifouling systems. Pull the slider below and see the difference between the test-area coated with Hempaguard and the area coated with a market average solution – in this case on a suezmax oil tanker laid up for 3 months in fouling-aggressive Singaporean water. It is estimated that had the entire ship been coated, not only the test area, the operator would save 2,2 million dollar on the fuel bill.

Pull the slider and discover the effect of Hempaguard compared to market average solutions